The big night everyone was looking
forward to is now over and the results of the Clinton-Trump Presidential debate
is still being debated. Who won is a matter of personal opinion—and political
leanings. Over 84 million people gave up Monday Night Football to watch the two
spar off on national television and many felt disappointed.
Following
the contemptuous battle for the minds and hearts of the American people major
polls give the edge to Hillary Clinton. Apparently her concealed charm took
center stage. She managed to appear calm, smiling and adroitly able to dodge
the soft-ball questions put to her by noted liberal newscaster Lester Holt. On
the other side Donald Trump might have increased his position if he had gone
for Clinton’s throat but appeared to be reluctant to take advantage of the
opportunities. She managed to leave open doors that normally would have been an
invitation for defeat but Trump, for whatever reason didn’t take advantage.
In
addition the moderator, Holt, riddled Trump with insignificant questions as to
President Obama’s place of birth (the “birther” nonsense), his tax returns and
other topics that have little to do with the various crisis and issues America
is facing today.
Holt,
holding to his left leanings, never questioned Clinton about her
email scandal, Libya, the Clinton Foundation or any other subject that she has
come under fire. No questions regarding her time with the Rose Law Firm, her
relationship with Vince Foster, her making a ton of money with a $1,000 venture
into the futures cattle market (her first experience ever by the way), and a
list of other allegations that previously came under public scrutiny but were
buried by political pressure. Like her husband Bill, she wore a coat of Teflon.
The
rules that apply to ordinary people are sharply disregarded when it comes to
the Clinton’s.
The
points Trump tried to present were valid. When Hillary attacked him for not
providing his tax returns (which by the way the majority of the American people
couldn’t give a hoot about), he countered by saying he would instruct his attorneys
to provide the tax records just as soon as Hillary produced the 33,000 deleted
emails she had destroyed.
And
on and on it went for 90 minutes. Was anything of value revealed?” No. Was any
issue of any value to American security? No. Was a complete truthful admission
of alleged offences by either party proven? No.
Frankly
the weak presentation can be put to the feet of Lester Holt. He was completely
ill prepared—or he simply didn’t want to score any attacks effecting Hillary.
Who knows other than to examine the questions asked of both participants. It
was recorded that Holt interrupted Trump some 40 plus times and Clinton only seven.
Holt appeared argumentative when dealing with Trump but condescending with
Clinton.
Maybe
it was the perfume she was wearing.
But
now there are two more debates to be held. No question Trump will spend some
time licking his wounds but he is no fool. You can bet your bottom dollar he
will be better prepared for the next bout.
Yet
even at that how will the majority of news outlets—both print and
television—cover the next debate?
There
was a time when journalists held true to the facts. They relied on the “who,
what, where, when,” when covering a story. But today it is much different. Bias
is blazed across headlines, reporter’s opinion take precedent and what is
supposed to read as news actually comes out more like a feature story.
We
make no bones as to our position in this column. We are conservatives. But in
fairness we try to be honest in presenting the facts.
For
the sake of our country it is paramount that the American people judge these
two candidates on their varsity, talent and love of country. Admittedly when
Trump first came on the scene we were reluctant to take him seriously. His past
record as a Democrat with liberal leanings scared a lot of folks including this
writer. But on closer examination much came out as to his beliefs, patriotism
and sincerity. Like he said; he doesn’t need the money he is interested only in
the greatness of the United States and what the country can look forward to in
the future. As for Hillary, well, everyone knows her record!
If
America continues down the road it has traveled for the past 20 years the
nation has little hope of remaining a world power. Our security will be further
compromised and our economy will be in the tank. The bitter pill of depression
looms on what this election is all about. Our military is reduced to levels
lower then when the United States was attacked by Japan, December 7, 1941.
Today it seems our love of country is reduced to “what can I get?”
And
truth and honesty in government is an oxymoron.
Let’s
see what comes with the second debate. But fair warning; hold your breath!